What were Our Chinese Colleagues Writing in 2025?
If China can no longer be bypassed, then perhaps the first thing to do, once we stop walking past it, is to look at it directly.
If China can no longer be bypassed, then perhaps the first thing to do, once we stop walking past it, is to look at it directly.
Regardless of how radical the transformation may be, as long as it is a change initiated by Chinese actors themselves, Chinese people remain Chinese.
Chinese legal academia is mourning the loss of Professor Jiang Ping, an eminent figure acknowledged as perhaps the most prominent rule of law ambassador and an esteemed legal educator in the modern history of Chinese law.
Assessing collaborations in the intersection of law, politics, and the society and facilitating a deepened dialogue with China requires not only profound knowledge of Chinese legal thinking and legal tradition(s), but also crossing our national traditions when practicing Chinese legal history (in a global perspective). From 12 until 16 June, 15 scholars of Chinese law from China, Europe and the United States followed the invitation of the Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory (mpilhlt) to participate in the first of what is meant to be a series of workshops on Chinese legal tradition.
We use cookies to provide you with the best online experience. By clicking "Accept all services", you agree to them (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent according to Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. Under "Settings or reject" you can change your settings or reject the data processing. You can change your selection at any time under "Privacy“ at the bottom of the page.